Popular on Ex Nihilo Magazine

Productivity & Tools

Delivery Apps Are Killing Restaurants

A pizza shop called Giuseppe received $1,043 from 46 Grubhub orders in March 2020. Grubhub kept $666 in commissions,

Delivery Apps Are Killing Restaurants

A pizza shop called Giuseppe received $1,043 from 46 Grubhub orders in March 2020. Grubhub kept $666 in commissions, delivery fees, processing fees, promotions, and adjustments. The restaurant got $377. Giuseppe’s owner posted the statement on Facebook.

That’s 64% going to the platform. The pizza shop’s food cost, labor, rent, and utilities came from the remaining 36%. Nothing was left for profit.

This isn’t unusual. Delivery app commissions range from 15-35% officially. Add payment processing fees, promotional costs, and marketing charges, and total platform costs hit 40-50%. Restaurant margins typically run 10-15% before delivery apps. The math doesn’t work.

Commission Structures

DoorDash charges 15-30% commission depending on service tier. The Basic plan at 15% provides listing only. The Plus plan at 25% adds marketing. The Premier plan at 30% includes priority placement and reduced customer delivery fees.

UberEats operates similarly, with commissions from 15-30% based on service level. Deliveroo in the UK and Europe charges 25-35%. Just Eat Takeaway charges 12-14% but offers less service. Zomato in India charges 12-20%.

Most restaurants choose higher commission tiers because lower tiers don’t generate orders. Basic listings without marketing get buried. Restaurants pay 25-30% to be visible.

Beyond base commissions, platforms charge additional fees. Payment processing adds 2-3%. Promotional campaigns cost extra. Customer acquisition fees apply for new customers. The published commission understates true costs.

Why Restaurants Can’t Refuse

Restaurants face a prisoner’s dilemma. If competitors are on delivery platforms and you’re not, you lose customers. If everyone is on platforms, everyone pays 30% commissions and no one profits more.

During COVID lockdowns, delivery platforms became essential. Restaurants had no choice. The platforms gained market power. Post-COVID, consumer habits stuck. Many customers now order exclusively through apps rather than calling restaurants directly.

Platforms control customer relationships. When someone orders through DoorDash, DoorDash owns that customer data. The restaurant can’t market to them directly. The customer thinks of themselves as a DoorDash customer, not a restaurant customer.

Younger consumers particularly prefer app ordering. They don’t want to call restaurants or visit websites. They want to browse multiple restaurants in one app. Restaurants that opt out lose an entire demographic.

Menu Price Inflation

Restaurants respond by raising menu prices on delivery platforms. An item costing $12 in-store might cost $15-18 on UberEats. This covers the commission while maintaining margin.

But price inflation creates problems. Customers notice. They compare platform prices to in-store prices. Some stop ordering delivery. Others blame the restaurant rather than the platform.

Platforms discourage price inflation through various mechanisms. Reviews affect search ranking. Customers who feel prices are too high leave bad reviews. Algorithms may deprioritize restaurants with prices significantly above competitors.

Some restaurants maintain identical prices across channels and accept lower margins on delivery orders. They view delivery as marketing rather than profit center. This only works for restaurants with strong dine-in business subsidizing delivery losses.

Direct Ordering Attempts

Some restaurants built direct ordering systems to avoid platform commissions. They add QR codes to packaging asking customers to order directly next time. They offer discounts for direct orders.

These efforts largely failed. Customers want the convenience of one app for multiple restaurants. They don’t want ten different restaurant apps on their phone. The platform network effect is too strong.

A few restaurant groups with multiple locations achieved scale with direct ordering. Chains with brand recognition can drive customers to proprietary apps. Small independent restaurants can’t.

ChowNow charges restaurants $150-300 monthly subscription instead of per-order commissions. This works for restaurants doing high delivery volume. Low-volume restaurants pay more per order than they would on commission-based platforms.

Alternative Platform Models

Some cities saw restaurants form cooperatives. They jointly funded delivery platforms charging 8-14% commission instead of 30%. Examples exist in Barcelona, Berlin, and several US cities.

These co-op platforms struggle competing with DoorDash and UberEats marketing budgets. Customer acquisition is expensive. The major platforms spend heavily on ads and promotions. Co-ops can’t match that spending.

Just Eat Takeaway in Europe charges lower commissions (12-14%) but provides less service. Restaurants handle their own delivery or the platform connects them with independent couriers. This reduces platform costs but increases restaurant operational complexity.

In India, Zomato and Swiggy charge 12-20% commissions, lower than Western platforms. But they also provide less support and infrastructure. Restaurants manage more of the delivery process themselves.

Ghost Kitchens and Virtual Brands

Some restaurants responded by launching delivery-only brands from their existing kitchens. A single kitchen might operate 3-5 virtual restaurant brands on delivery platforms.

This spreads fixed costs across multiple revenue streams. The same staff and equipment produce food for multiple brands. Each brand targets different cuisine types or price points.

CloudKitchens and similar companies rent commercial kitchen space to delivery-only operations. These ghost kitchens have no dining rooms, only cooking facilities. Lower rent makes delivery commissions more manageable.

But ghost kitchens face quality control issues. Customers can’t see the kitchen. Food quality varies. Many ghost kitchen brands gained bad reputations and failed.

Platform Market Power

DoorDash acquired Deliveroo in 2025 for £2.9 billion, consolidating market power. In many markets, 2-3 platforms control 80%+ of delivery. This oligopoly maintains high commissions.

Restaurants have limited negotiating power. Large chains can negotiate lower commissions through volume. Independent restaurants accept standard rates or get delisted.

Regulatory intervention happened in some markets. New York City capped delivery commissions at 15% during COVID. The cap expired. Platforms threatened to exit markets with permanent caps. Cities backed down.

Some European jurisdictions investigated delivery platforms for anticompetitive practices. Enforcement is slow. Platforms adjusted terms slightly while maintaining market control.

The Customer Experience

Customers pay high delivery fees, service fees, and tips on top of inflated menu prices. A $12 meal becomes $25-30 delivered. They blame restaurants for high prices and platforms for high fees.

Both restaurants and customers lose. Platforms capture value while providing infrastructure neither party could build independently. The network effect entrench existing platforms and prevents competition.

Some customers shifted back to in-person dining or pickup to avoid fees. But many stuck with delivery apps for convenience despite costs.

Where Restaurant Margins Go

The global food delivery market reached $289 billion in 2024 and projects to $500 billion by 2030. This revenue growth comes from restaurants, not from platforms creating new value.

Restaurants that previously kept 100% of takeout revenue now keep 60-70%. The 30-40% going to platforms represents margin compression. Some restaurants closed because delivery economics didn’t work.

Delivery platforms are profitable now after years of losses. DoorDash, UberEats, and others reached profitability in 2023-2024 by raising commissions and reducing promotions. Their profits come directly from restaurant margins.

The business model works for platforms. Restaurants struggle. Many continue participating because opting out means losing customers. The industry reshaped permanently.

Sources:

National Checkbook – Restaurant Delivery Fees

Restaurant Business Online

National Restaurant Association

Statista – Food Delivery Market


Ex Nihilo magazine is for entrepreneurs and startups, connecting them with investors and fueling the global entrepreneur movement

About Author

Conor Healy

Conor Timothy Healy is a Brand Specialist at Tokyo Design Studio Australia and contributor to Ex Nihilo Magazine and Design Magazine.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *