Popular on Ex Nihilo Magazine

Global Trends

Why Leaders Should Think Like Anthropologists: The Secret to Understanding Your Team

Anthropologists spend their careers studying people in their natural environments. They watch, listen, and try to understand why humans

Why Leaders Should Think Like Anthropologists: The Secret to Understanding Your Team

When was the last time you actually watched your employees work? Not walked past their desks or sat in on a meeting, but truly observed how they move through their day, where they get stuck, what frustrates them, what makes them light up?

Most leaders rely on dashboards, KPIs, and quarterly reports to understand their organisations. They trust the numbers to tell them everything they need to know. But here’s what those spreadsheets miss: the quiet resignation in someone’s eyes during team meetings, the workarounds people create because your systems don’t actually work, the reasons your best performer just handed in their notice.

The best leaders don’t just manage by the numbers. This is why leaders think like anthropologists.

What It Actually Means to Lead Like an Anthropologist

Anthropologists spend their careers studying people in their natural environments. They watch, listen, and try to understand why humans behave the way they do. They don’t start with assumptions. They don’t trust what people say in surveys or focus groups because they know people often say one thing and do something completely different. Understanding why leaders think like anthropologists starts with grasping this fundamental approach.

When A.G. Lafley became CEO of Procter & Gamble, he had a problem. The company was struggling to innovate, and traditional market research wasn’t giving him answers. So he did something unusual for a Fortune 500 CEO. He left his office.

Lafley started visiting people’s homes. He watched how they actually used P&G products. He went shopping with them. He stood in their kitchens and bathrooms, observing the small frustrations they experienced that they’d never think to mention in a survey. As he put it: “I don’t think the answers are just in the numbers. You have to get out and look.”

This approach transformed P&G. The company created programmes where employees would live with customers, join them on shopping trips, even work behind retail counters. They weren’t conducting market research in the traditional sense. They were doing ethnography. They were seeing the world through their customers’ eyes.

Senior leaders, including Lafley himself, made this fieldwork a regular practice. They saw product flaws. They discovered unmet needs. They found opportunities that no amount of data analysis would have revealed. The result? P&G drove significant revenue growth throughout that decade by solving problems they didn’t even know existed.

Why Your Office Is Lying to You

Here’s the uncomfortable truth: the further you climb in an organisation, the less you actually know about how it works.

People filter information as it travels up the chain of command. They tell you what they think you want to hear. They present problems in the best possible light. By the time information reaches your desk, it’s been sanitised, summarised, and stripped of all the messy human details that actually matter.

In 1997, General Motors was struggling to get engineering teams from three different divisions to work together on a new vehicle. The project was chaotic. Meetings accomplished nothing. People were frustrated. The numbers looked bad, but nobody could figure out why.

GM called in Elizabeth Briody, an anthropologist, to observe what was happening. She didn’t look at org charts or project timelines. She watched the meetings. She talked to people. She paid attention to the small details everyone else ignored.

What she discovered was simple but crucial. The Opel team from Germany expected meetings to be agenda-driven sessions where decisions got made. The small car group expected working sessions where ideas would be freely discussed. The Saturn team expected consensus-building exercises where everyone had a voice.

Same meeting, three completely different cultural expectations. Nobody was wrong. They were just operating from different invisible rulebooks. The meetings were doomed from the start, not because of technical problems or personality conflicts, but because of unspoken cultural assumptions nobody had bothered to examine.

Unfortunately, Briody’s insights came too late. GM’s leadership shut down the project. But imagine if they’d brought her in at the beginning. Imagine if GM’s leaders had been trained to spot these cultural differences themselves.

The Intel Revolution You’ve Never Heard About

In 1998, Intel hired a woman named Genevieve Bell. She had a doctorate in cultural anthropology. She’d spent years studying indigenous communities in Australia. She knew absolutely nothing about semiconductors or technology companies.

Intel’s initial request was almost laughable. They wanted her to help them understand women. All women. All 3.2 billion of them.

Bell’s response was more measured than theirs deserved. She spent her first year at Intel treating the company itself as fieldwork. She attended meetings where she had no idea what was happening. She wrote down every question. She observed the engineers like they were a tribe she’d just discovered in the field.

And then she started traveling. She visited homes around the world, watching how people actually used technology in their daily lives. She met a Muslim boy in Kuala Lumpur who used his mobile phone to orient himself toward Mecca for prayer. She found ceremonial stores in Malaysia selling paper replicas of the latest phones to be burned as offerings for ancestors.

These observations changed Intel’s entire strategy. Bell convinced the company’s chip designers to stop their obsession with building ever-faster processors for Western markets. She showed them that for most of the world, the internet was and would continue to be mostly text on a phone. Intel developed its Atom chips as a result—cheaper, lower-power processors designed for markets the company had been ignoring.

Bell also helped Intel move into the smart TV market by studying how people actually behave when they’re being entertained in their living room versus sitting at a computer. The physical space matters. The social context matters. The cultural expectations matter. None of this shows up in usage statistics or market research surveys.

Intel eventually hired over 100 anthropologists and social scientists. Microsoft did the same, becoming one of the world’s largest employers of anthropologists. So did IBM, Hewlett-Packard, and Xerox. These weren’t feel-good diversity hires. These were strategic investments in understanding the humans behind the data. This is precisely why leaders think like anthropologists—they recognise that understanding human behaviour drives better business decisions.

The Kit Kat Discovery

Sometimes the most valuable insights come from noticing patterns that everyone else overlooks.

Nestlé owned Kit Kat, that quintessentially British chocolate bar. When they introduced it to Japan, sales were decent but unremarkable. Then something odd happened. Every winter, sales on the island of Kyushu would surge dramatically.

Traditional market research would have noted this seasonal spike and moved on. But someone at Nestlé was curious enough to dig deeper. They discovered that students were buying Kit Kat bars as good luck tokens before taking their entrance exams.

Why? Because “Kit Kat” sounds like “kitto katsu” in the local dialect, which means “you will surely win” or “you must overcome.” It was pure coincidence, a linguistic accident. But once Nestlé understood this cultural meaning, they built their entire Japanese marketing strategy around it.

They created exam-themed packaging. They developed Japanese flavours—matcha green tea, wasabi, sake. They positioned Kit Kat as a symbol of perseverance and success. By 2014, Kit Kat was Japan’s best-selling confection.

This didn’t come from focus groups or consumer surveys. It came from someone paying attention to an anomaly and being curious enough to understand what it meant.

What Anthropological Leadership Actually Looks Like

David Neeleman, founder of JetBlue, didn’t just read customer satisfaction scores. He regularly worked as a flight attendant on his own airline’s planes. He served drinks. He helped passengers stow their luggage. He chatted with them about their experience.

This wasn’t a publicity stunt. Neeleman was engaging in participant observation, one of anthropology’s core methods. He was experiencing his own product the way his customers experienced it. He noticed things no report could tell him. He heard complaints people would never bother to write down. He saw which parts of the service actually mattered to people and which parts were just corporate box-ticking. This demonstrates why leaders think like anthropologists—they value direct observation over filtered reports.

Nike’s CEO Mark Parker, who led the company from 2006 to 2020, spent extensive time with the people who made up popular culture: athletes, musicians, artists, activists. He wasn’t networking or doing celebrity endorsements. He was trying to understand what made these people tick, what they cared about, how they saw the world.

This ethnographic approach to understanding Nike’s market allowed Parker to keep the company connected to the pulse of American culture. He could design and innovate for real people with real lives, not for the abstract demographic categories that marketing departments love.

The Skills You Need to Develop

Thinking like an anthropologist isn’t about getting a PhD or conducting formal research studies. It’s about developing a specific mindset and set of practices.

First, become genuinely curious. The smartest person in the room isn’t always the best leader. The most curious one is. Stop assuming you have all the answers. Stop trusting your gut instincts about how things work. Your gut instincts are shaped by your own cultural background and experiences, which are inevitably limited.

When Elon Musk approaches problems, he keeps asking “why” until he gets to the root cause. Why do legacy car companies struggle with electric vehicles? Why does it cost so much to go to space? He challenges every assumption. He watches how systems actually function rather than how they’re supposed to function.

Second, observe people in their natural environment. Stop relying exclusively on what people tell you in meetings or surveys. Watch what they actually do. Airbnb’s founders didn’t sit in their office trying to figure out how to scale. They went to their hosts’ homes. They stayed in the rooms. They experienced the service as guests.

Those direct observations informed key features of the platform: the importance of direct communication between hosts and guests, the critical role of safety and trust, the small touches that make someone feel welcome. None of this would have emerged from traditional market research.

Third, pay attention to the small details everyone else ignores. Anthropologists are trained to notice things that seem insignificant. The way people position their desks. The informal networks that really get things done. The unwritten rules everyone follows but nobody talks about.

These details reveal the true culture of your organisation. Company values posted on the wall don’t matter if nobody actually lives them. What matters is the story people tell themselves about “how we do things here.”

Fourth, wipe the slate clean. When you walk into a situation, try to approach it with beginner’s mind. Forget what you think you know. Disavow yourself of preconceived notions. As marketing research expert Siamack Salari points out, ethnographic research is always agenda-less. You’re not looking to confirm what you already believe. You’re trying to discover what you don’t know.

Fifth, spend time with people who are nothing like you. The biggest blind spot for most leaders is that they’re surrounded by people who think like them, talk like them, and share their assumptions about how the world works. Anthropologists call this ethnocentrism, and it’s deadly for innovation.

ADP’s chief business anthropologist Martha Bird emphasises this point when talking about generational differences in the workplace. A Boomer is culturally different from someone in Gen Z. They use different language. They grew up in different contexts. They see the world differently. If you’re designing a workplace culture based only on your own generation’s preferences, you’re missing most of your workforce.

The 80/20 Rule You’re Ignoring

Here’s a statistic that should make every data-obsessed leader uncomfortable. Research from the University of Michigan’s Ross School of Business shows that approximately 20% of information about people and how they work is quantitative and amenable to spreadsheets and data analysis.

That means 80% of crucial information is accessible only through qualitative insight. It requires experience, judgement, and interpretation. It requires spending time with people, understanding their context, and seeing the world from their perspective. This is another reason why leaders think like anthropologists—the most important information can’t be quantified.

You can’t capture someone’s motivation in a KPI. You can’t measure cultural fit in a performance metric. You can’t understand why your diversity initiative is failing by looking at hiring numbers alone.

Anthropology is concerned primarily with understanding how other people see and experience the world. That’s exactly what leaders need to do. Your employees aren’t motivated by the same things that motivate you. Your customers don’t think about your product the way you think about your product. The sooner you understand this, the better you’ll lead.

What You’re Really Looking For

When Gillian Tett, chair of the Financial Times’s US editorial board and trained anthropologist, talks about her field, she emphasises three key approaches that matter for business leaders.

First, make the strange familiar. This is about understanding people and cultures that are different from you. In a globalised economy, you need to understand how people in different markets think and behave. You can’t just export your assumptions and expect them to work everywhere.

Second, make the familiar strange. This is about viewing your own organisation as if you were an outsider. Step back and look at the way you’ve always done things with fresh eyes. Ask yourself: if a Martian landed here and looked around, what would they see?

Your company culture is invisible to you precisely because you’re immersed in it. You need to develop the ability to see your own organisation as an anthropologist would see a foreign culture—with curiosity, without judgment, paying attention to patterns you’ve stopped noticing.

Third, listen for social silence. This is perhaps the most powerful skill. It’s about noticing what people aren’t saying, what topics are avoided, what assumptions remain unquestioned. The things nobody talks about are often the things that matter most.

Why did nobody mention the brewing conflict between different engineering teams at GM? Because speaking up would have violated unspoken norms about hierarchy and professional courtesy. The silence itself was data. The avoidance was information. But you have to know how to listen for it.

Your Spreadsheets Are Only Telling Half the Story

You can run your organisation by the numbers if you want. You can make decisions based purely on quarterly reports and performance dashboards. Many leaders do.

But the best leaders understand that businesses are fundamentally about people. They’re about human behaviour, cultural dynamics, unspoken assumptions, and the messy reality of how humans actually work, buy, and make decisions.

The numbers will tell you what happened. Anthropology tells you why. It shows you what people need before they know they need it. It reveals problems you didn’t know existed. It helps you understand the cultural dynamics that can make or break your strategy.

In a world where AI can crunch data better than any human, the competitive advantage belongs to leaders who understand people better than their competitors do. That requires curiosity, observation, and the humility to admit that the view from your office isn’t the whole story.

You don’t need a PhD in anthropology. You just need to start thinking like an anthropologist. Get out of your office. Watch people work. Ask questions. Challenge your assumptions. Pay attention to the details everyone else ignores.

The answers you’re looking for aren’t in your spreadsheets. They’re in the break room, on the shop floor, in your customers’ homes, and in all the small moments that never make it into reports. You just have to be willing to look. Now you understand why leaders think like anthropologists—because the real story of your business lives in the details, not the data.

Sources

CNN Money – Intel’s Cultural Anthropologist (Genevieve Bell)

Simon Associates – How Corporate Anthropology Can Help Your Business Grow

Harvard Business Review – What Anthropologists Can Teach Us About Work Culture


Ex Nihilo magazine is for entrepreneurs and startups, connecting them with investors and fueling the global entrepreneur movement

About Author

Malvin Simpson

Malvin Christopher Simpson is a Content Specialist at Tokyo Design Studio Australia and contributor to Ex Nihilo Magazine.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *